Scientific / academic submission
A transparent route to independent review.
The engineering system is an external-review candidate, not a certified or accepted scholarly submission. The evidence-synthesis track remains blocked pending source-grounded human review.
Disclosure: This is a publication-safe project and submission-preparation page. It is not a peer-reviewed scientific finding, clinical advice, journal acceptance, investment offer or endorsement.
Release evidence
Latest validated public snapshot
Values are read from the published public JSON files; a failed read is shown explicitly rather than silently replacing it with a current-looking estimate.
Checking published snapshot integrity metadata…
Two submission tracks
Separating infrastructure from conclusions
Track A — methods and infrastructure
Current gate: external-review candidate, not submission-ready.
Scope: source surveillance, bounded collection, record linkage, audit trail, validation, publication firewall, reproducibility and human-governance design.
Outstanding: frozen release candidate, independent reproduction, reviewer declarations and response record, protected-change controls, reliable scheduled backup and replacement of the legacy publication relay.
Track B — health and cessation synthesis
Current gate: not submission-ready; conclusion-sensitive publication prohibited.
Scope: pre-registered questions, eligibility decisions, verified outcomes, comparators, smoking and dual-use history, funding/conflicts, risk of bias, uncertainty and independent scientific judgement.
Outstanding: complete a governed human-review pilot, assess extracted outcomes and complete second-person verification before any effect or causal synthesis.
Inspect the evidence chain
Documents a reviewer can inspect today
Public methodology
Methods and scope, including what automation can and cannot determine.
Read methodology →Question register
Six bounded research questions with explicit readiness and candidate-count caveats.
Open synthesis register →Source coverage and integrity
Data provenance, validation, research-integrity monitoring and discovery limitations.
Inspect coverage →Independent review route
Named access, conflict declarations and restricted packs are governed separately.
Review process →Submission threshold: a styled website does not create peer review, consent, completeness, ethics approval or a scholarly DOI. These must be demonstrated with external evidence and a frozen publication record.