UK Vaping & Nicotine Evidence Observatory

Evidence before conclusion.

SCC Vaping collects, checks and organises scientific research and official UK data. The public observatory shows what the evidence system currently contains, how it was assembled, and what is not yet ready for conclusion-sensitive synthesis.

Coverage is not certainty. Automated classification is provisional until governed human review.

Facts about the evidence system

What the latest release actually says

These are operational and coverage facts, not claims of health benefit, harm or causality.

1,200

Literature source records

PubMed, Europe PMC and Crossref records entered the literature stage in the published evidence summary.

986

Canonical candidate records

Records remaining in the quality-gated public evidence map after filtering and deduplication.

834

Clinical trials indexed

ClinicalTrials.gov records in the published registry reconciliation dataset.

110

Provisional RCT classifications

Records currently classified as randomised controlled trials. Classification remains provisional until review.

0

Human-reviewed records

The latest published readiness report records no conclusion-sensitive human review completed.

0

Synthesis-ready records

No record currently clears the comparator, outcome, effect-estimate and risk-of-bias review gate.

Evidence domains

Navigate the research without flattening the questions

Separate questions, comparators and evidence types remain separate by design.

Respiratory179 topic-tagged records

Navigation tag count in the current quality-gated literature.

Cessation152 topic-tagged records

Smoking cessation evidence candidates across multiple study designs and comparators.

Cardiovascular103 topic-tagged records

Cardiovascular evidence candidates, not a pooled effect estimate.

Young people398 topic-tagged records

Youth-focused evidence candidates plus separate official prevalence sources.

Scientific firewall: the current release explicitly reports that automated metadata classification is provisional. Effect estimates, comparators, confounding, funding and risk-of-bias fields require source-grounded extraction and review before synthesis.

Transparency

Designed to be challenged

01

Collect

Broad discovery from scientific, trial, statistical and regulatory sources.

02

Validate

Deduplicate, quarantine and preserve provenance rather than silently discard.

03

Review

Conclusion-sensitive fields remain behind a human scientific review gate.

04

Publish

Only publication-safe aggregate and audit metadata reaches this public repository.